In the global exchange and in the
local wholesale markets, the price of most of the natural gas is
established through regional businesses, or through contracts indexed
to competitive fuels (mainly oil). Another way used is regulation by
government authorities. Whatever the price formation mechanism may
be, its importance will be paramount in the next 30 years. Certain
trends of change in the natural gas business have already begun to
appear. Among them, one can mention its globalization, vertical
integration (which is erasing the limits of roles in the supply chain
and changing its structure), the consolidation of regional sales, the
convergence between natural gas and electric power, the need of
investments in infrastructure, the liberalization of markets and the
maturation of local industries; In short, all these factors will
affect the price formation environment.
Since natural gas became a market good
with an economic value, it has attracted producers, consumers,
governments and stakeholders in general. However, the price of gas
has not appeared on the news as many times as the price of oil, since
for many countries it has been less important than oil.
Unlike oil, natural gas has
substitutes in most of its applications and these have balanced the
fluctuation of its price. It has always been a topic of regional
interest - not global - and the reserves of this energy were more
widely distributed, which did not encourage geopolitical problems.
But in recent years, these differences between natural gas and oil
have become less evident, because the former increased its share in
the global energy matrix, its prices rose and became more volatile.
In addition, liquefied natural gas (LNG) allowed to unite
intercontinental markets, with the consequent increase in its export
capacity.
Thus, there is an understanding of
natural gas as a commodity product and the determination of its price
according to the totality of its market, with the use of a forward
market or spot price modality. Natural gas prices in North America,
Europe and Asian countries have been monitored closely, and are
generally known references. In the case of countries belonging to the
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), these
represented the largest consumers of natural gas, so the institutions
responsible for leading the search for energy options were always
located there, sponsored for their governments and companies. While
prices in the OECD area are driven by the market, and therefore are
susceptible to economic theories and models, in the rest of the world
gas prices show important exceptions, for example for political
reasons, that they make them difficult to predict.
During 2007, the use of natural gas
dispersed equitably among the OECD countries and since then its
consumption has grown at slower rates than those that are taking
place in countries that do not belong to this organization. In
addition, many of these other countries are becoming key players that
determine the supply of gas in world markets and only forecast that
their presence will continue to grow, so that their decisions on the
price will be strongly felt in the OECD. Russia is a clear example of
this trend. Studies of their natural gas balances conclude that
Russian natural gas will increase its participation significantly and
that, therefore, they should be made big investments to avoid
shortages. This situation provokes discussions about the adequacy of
investment budgets. Most Russian natural gas is consumed internally
and if this variable can be contained through price increases,
investments would be more than sufficient. Long-term estimates of the
change in the price of gas against demand change according to each
country and each period of time. If the achievement of a consensus on
the volatility of the price of natural gas in OECD countries is
difficult, it is even more difficult to achieve it in other
countries.
In competitive markets, with many
sellers and many buyers, prices are governed by supply and demand,
balancing. But some changes in the environment of these markets can
cause an increase or decrease in the price, without responding to the
logic of stability. Given the new characteristics of commodity that
LNG has taken, added to the characteristics of the markets and
national industries, their prices do not necessarily accommodate
themselves under competitive conditions. Some markets have been
liberalized, but others remain regulated. There are factors of short,
medium and long term that influence in diverse ways directly on the
prices.
There are many examples in which the
peaks of natural gas demand led to spikes in their price, which could
occur due to changes in climate, legal regulations or policies. A raw
winter or a summer of unusual heat will shake the normal demand,
causing a rapid increase in price. This type of medium / short term
factor could be observed when hurricanes Katrina and Rita hit the
United States and resulted in a 13% drop in natural gas production
and a consequent increase in its price by 26%. As an example of the
long-term factors, the results of the exploration for new reserves
and the discoveries that increase the volumes of available gas, which
lower their price according to the regions, can be taken.
There are also other factors that
affect demand, such as economic growth, which brings with it an
improvement in the quality of life of the population and that
requires an increase in energy intensity and in the structure of the
market (as new suppliers , new companies and changes in the
networks). In OECD countries, a large part of the supply does not
accommodate supply and demand. In Continental Europe and in the
developed part of Asia there is a small number of importers and
wholesalers who have been negotiating with a small group of exporting
countries, represented by their national oil companies.
In Europe this structure is breaking
down, as there are new entrants: traditional LNG sellers decrease and
new suppliers await their entry through long-distance pipelines.
Outside the OECD, there are many countries that consume natural gas,
which fix their prices through methods that are not always
transparent. Political and social considerations are probably the
culprits of this system. Regulators aim to fix prices without
affecting the competitiveness of industrial consumers, overloading
residential consumers and causing potential political unrest. This
criterion is ambiguous, because it reflects that consumers have grown
accustomed to preferences over objective thresholds.
There are different ways in the world
to form the prices of natural gas, influenced by economic and
political issues specific to each country. In this sense, the
following existing main mechanisms can be enumerated:
• Gas gas competition
• Oil price escalation
• Bilateral monopoly
• Netback value
• Regulation based on the cost of
the service
• Regulation based on political or
social issues
• Regulation below cost
A comparative analysis with the
mechanisms scenario presented since 2005 offers conclusions about its
variations over time. Not only did the share of gas increase by gas,
but price allocations below cost also increased, as a result of
national regulations in the face of increases in consumption. In
general, the markets that use the mechanism related to the escalation
of the price of crude, present the biggest drops in their global
presence. Globally, since 2007, a third of natural gas sold and
purchased regulated its pricing mechanism through the gas-for-gas
competition system.
The mechanism based on regulation
through social or political issues decreased, mainly due to changes
in Brazil and Argentina. It is commonly accepted that the gas gas
competition: means that the price of natural gas is the result of the
interaction of supply and demand and its variation of certain periods
(daily, weekly or monthly, by seasons or by annual periods). The
exchange takes place in physical centers, such as Henry Hub or NBP
and is supported by future developed markets and by the online
exchange of commodities.
This does not mean that oil prices do
not play a determining role in the price of natural gas, since key
groups of consumers of natural gas can switch between petroleum
products or natural gas, or coal and natural gas, according to the
economic convenience. However, the connection of this market with the
prices of different fuels, contrary to the contractual one, does not
remain stable over time nor prevents gas prices from moving outside
their boundaries for long periods of time.
The prices of natural gas, scaled by
the price of oil, identifies the dominant mechanism in Continental
Europe and Asia. Thus, the price of natural gas is bound in a
contractual manner, usually through base prices and adjustment
clauses, to one or more of the competitive fuels. In Europe it is
normally related to fuel oil and in Asia it is related to crude oil.
Adjustment clauses state that if a value of the adjustment fuel
changes, the price of natural gas will change proportionally,
depending on the factor that has been modified. Of course, this does
not mean that prices remain unrelated to demand.
Regarding bilateral monopolies, this
modality occurs when the dominant price mechanisms are based on
agreements between countries. This was the case of the "Eastern
Bloc", which included the former Soviet Union, Eastern and
Central Europe. The price of gas Natural was set for a period of
time, usually a year, and negotiations took place only at the
political level. Consumers paid part of the cost through the
realization of projects, such as the improvement of gas pipelines.
This type of bilateral arrangements can still be seen in undeveloped
countries where a strong supplier stands out, for example, national
oil companies, which faces one or a few dominant buyers.
The Netback valuation includes the
price that arises from the final price of the product, less the cost
of manufacturing the product (including a profit margin), less the
cost of transporting natural gas from the deposit to the point of
consumption. The payment received by the seller depends on the final
price offered by the buyer on the product. A typical example of the
application of this mechanism is the price offered to the seller of
natural gas by the electricity sector, which depends on the final
price given to the energy product offered (thus the price of natural
gas depends on the price of electricity). This is also common in the
case of the sale of natural gas for the production of chemicals, such
as ammonium.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario